• Aboriginals in North America
  • Beast Literature
  • Canadiana.1
  • Dances & Music
  • Europe: Ukraine & Russia
  • Fables and Fairy Tales
  • Fables by Jean de La Fontaine
  • Feasts & Liturgy
  • Great Books Online
  • La Princesse de Clèves
  • Middle East
  • Molière
  • Nominations
  • Posts on Love Celebrated
  • Posts on the United States
  • The Art and Music of Russia
  • The French Revolution & Napoleon Bonaparte
  • Voyageurs Posts
  • Canadiana.2

Micheline's Blog

~ Art, music, books, history & current events

Micheline's Blog

Category Archives: The Enlightenment

Voltaire: “L’Affaire Calas”

08 Sunday Mar 2015

Posted by michelinewalker in France, The Enlightenment

≈ 8 Comments

Tags

Cirey and Ferney, Descartes, Huguenot, L'Affaire Calas, Publicity, reason, Tolerance, Voltaire

François Marie Arouet, dit Voltaire, c. 1724-1721

François-Marie Arouet, dit Voltaire, c. 1724-1721, Nicolas de Largillière (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire (21 November 1694 – 30 May 1778)

“Those” are mainly members of the clergy of France, before it was nearly destroyed during the French Revolution. The Age of Enlightenment did not happen in France alone, but it was a time of liberation, rooted, among other texts, in René Descartes‘ Discourse on Method (1637). The reign of reason had begun.

Descartes: « Je pense, donc je suis » and the Tabula Rasa

We associate Descartes with the Cogito ergo sum (“I think, therefore I am”), his proof of his existence and, by extension, the existence of other human beings. The Je pense, donc je suis (The Discourse on the Method) is more easily understood if rewritten using the verb “to doubt.” If Descartes doubts, he is thinking, and if he is thinking, he is. By the way, the Discourse on Method, as it is usually referred to, was written in French. It was the first ever philosophical work written in the French language. However, his tabula rasa (cleared up table) sums up the Age of Enlightenment as it unfolded in 18th-century France. Built-in mental content was rejected.

The Age of Enlightenment did not happen in France alone. Voltaire was particularly impressed by England, where he was exiled and was inspired to write the Letters on England, first published in translation in England (London, 1733) and, one year later, in French (London, 1734). An unauthorized copy was published in France in 1734, and was censored. He escaped to Cirey-sur-Blaise, Madame du Châtelet‘s castle, which they refurbished. Madame du Châtelet, a mathematician and a physicist, was Voltaire’s companion until her premature death, at the age of 42, in 1749, which was before the Calas affair.

The Salons and Cafés

Brilliant men gathered in salons, a “key institution” (see Women’s Involvement in the French Salons) and French cafés. You will remember Madame de Geoffrin‘s salon, rue Saint-Honoré, and the Café Procope, the oldest café in Paris. Voltaire was an habitué, a regular, of salons and cafés, but he had to live away from Paris in order to escape  authorities who could have thrown him into the Bastille prison. Descartes chose to live in Holland, as reason was a tool feared by a repressive Church. As for Voltaire, having spent 11 months, maybe more, in the Bastille, he ended up living near the Swiss border.

Château de Ferney

Voltaire’s château de Ferney, Kassandra Kasparek (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Philosophe needs Two Dens

As I wrote in the post where I discussed the Letters on England (1734), Voltaire  (François-Marie Arouet; 21 November 1694 – 30 May 1778) was embastillé, thrown into the Bastille prison, because he had offended the Regent Louis-Philippe, duc d’Orléans. (See Voltaire: the Story begins.)

The lettre de cachet

At that time in the history of France, one could incarcerate a man without the benefit of a trial or the possibility for him to defend himself. One obtained a lettre de cachet, signed by the King or the Regent, countersigned by an official, and sealed: le cachet. In order to avoid imprisonment, Voltaire seldom resided in Paris. He claimed that philosophes (intellectuals) needed two dens or tanières, so they could flee easily from one to the other.

Voltaire expressed a philosophe‘s need for two lairs, deux tanières, in a letter he wrote to Madame Denis, his niece and companion.

« Rampant ainsi d’une tanière dans une autre, je me sauve des Rois…, car il faut toujours que les philosophes aient deux ou trois trous sous terre contre les chiens qui courent après eux. » (Voltaire, Lettre à madame Denis, 1745)

(“Thus crawling from one lair into another, I escape Kings…, for philosophes always need two or three holes underground against the dogs running after them.”)

Voltaire had transformed an inheritance into a fortune and could afford to own a château. He purchased Ferney, one hour away from Switzerland, where he bought a house, at Lausanne. After Madame du Châtelet’s death, to whose castle he had fled when the Lettres philosophiques were censored, Madame Denis, Voltaire’s niece, became his permanent companion.

Jean Calas

Jean Calas (19 March 1698, Lacabarède, Fr.—died 10 March 1762, in Toulouse) was a Huguenot (French Calvinist Protestant) merchant whose son, Marc-Antoine, committed suicide by hanging in his father’s cloth shop. His body was found on 14 October 1761. It appears Marc-Antoine planned to convert to Catholicism.

Suicide was a crime, punishable by death if one survived, and the bodies of persons who had committed suicides were defiled. The family therefore claimed they had found their son dead hanged. They made the suicide look like a murder.

Our cast is:

  • Marc-Antoine Calas, the victim, who planned to convert to Catholicism;
  • Jean Calas, his father and a Protestant (called Huguenot in France) merchant;
  • Anne-Rose Babibel, Jean Calas’ wife and a Protestant;
  • Pierre Calas, Marc-Antoine’s brother, a convert to Catholicism;
  • Jeanne Viguière, a governess and servant;
  • Gaubert Lavaysse, a guest.
The Body is discovered

The Body is discovered (Photo credit: l’Affaire Calas)

moni2

L’Affaire Calas, Casimir Destrem (1879). Musée Paul-Dupuy, Toulouse (Photo credit: l’Affaire Calas)

The Story

  1. On the evening of 13 October 1761, Marc-Antoine left the dinner table and hanged himself in his father’s shop. His body was discovered the next day, 14 October;
  2. On 15 October 1761, the family and their guest were interrogated. At first, they lied, but were advised to tell the truth;
  3. They told the truth. Marc-Antoine had been found dead. He had studied Law, but had difficulty entering his profession. As noted above, he was planning to convert to Catholicism;
  4. On 18 November 1761, Toulouse magistrates concluded, rather summarily, that Marc-Antoine had been murdered by Jean Calas, Anne-Rose (mother), Pierre Calas (brother), Jeanne Viguière (governess, servant), and Gaubert Lavaysse, a guest;
  5. The accused appealed the decision to the Parlement de Toulouse
  6. On 9 March 1762, Jean Calas was tried and found guilty;
  7. On 10 March 1762 he was executed: he was broke to death on the wheel;
  8. On 18 March 1762, Pierre, Marc-Antoine’s brother, was banished, but the other suspects were acquitted.
Jean Calas, broke on the wheel

Jean Calas, broke on the wheel (Photo credit: l’Affaire Calas)

Enters Voltaire

Voltaire was informed of this event by Dominique Audibert, from Marseilles. He soon suspected an injustice. How could Jean Calas, aged 64, strangle his robust son alone? In fact, how could he lift his son’s body and hang him? Why was he the only person to be found guilty and “roué?” The monitoire or chefs d’accusation (the charges) did not make any sense. Besides, Jean Calas had claimed he was innocent until the very end.

For three months, Voltaire sought the truth: “cette vérité qui importe au genre humain,” (this truth which is important to humankind). By the middle of June, he was convinced that there had been a miscarriage of justice.

« Je suis persuadé plus que jamais de l’innocence des Calas et de la cruelle bonne foi du Parlement de Toulouse qui a rendu le jugement le plus inique sur les indices les plus trompeurs ». (21 juin 1762)
Read more: http://www.site-magister.com/afcal.htm#ixzz3Ti70UVCz

(“I am persuaded more than ever of the innocence of the Calas family and of the cruel good faith of the Parliament of Toulouse who ruled most inequitably on the most deceptive evidence.” [21 June 1762])

Voltaire sent for Pierre and Donat, Donat being Pierre’s brother. They were refugees in Switzerland. This too was puzzling. Why had Pierre been banished? A person is either guilty or innocent.

“The only person Voltaire would incriminate was the magistrate, called a Capitoul, David de Beaudrige, who had been hostile to the Calas from the very start and had neglected to conduct a thorough enquiry.”

« Il incriminera le seul David de Beaudrigue, ce Capitoul [magistrate] qui, d’emblée [from the very start], s’était montré hostile aux Calas et avait négligé son enquête[.] »

In 1762, Voltaire would write Mémoire pour Dame Anne-Rose Cabibel… , texte de l’avocat Élie de Beaumont (1762). (consulter le document)
Read more: http://www.site-magister.com/afcal.htm#ixzz3Ti6lHBGC

pieces

Libelle (Photo credit: l’Affaire Calas)

Chodowiecki_Calas

Jean Calas bidding Farewell to his Family, Daniel Chodowiecki (Photo credit: l’Affaire Calas)

famcal

The Mother, the two Daughters, with Jeanne Viguière, their good maid, the Son and his young friend Lavaysse, Engraving by Jean-Baptiste Delafosse from a drawing by Carmontelle (1765). (Photo credit: l’Affaire Calas)

Voltaire’s Approach

Long before the twentieth century, Voltaire knew the effectiveness of publicity. He wrote to everyone, to Frederick the Great of Prussia, to Catherine the Great of Russia, to Stanisław I Leszczyński, the King of Poland.

He wrote anonymous pamphlets, libelles, as well as letters to Choiseul, the foreign minister, and Mme de Pompadour, Louis XV’s official mistress. He also sent Madame Calas to Paris where she met ministers and was introduced at Court. Moreover, he published a print by Daniel Chodowiecki showing Jean Calas bidding farewell to his grieving family.

  • On 1 March 1763, the Callas’ appeal was deemed admissible;
  • In November 1764, Voltaire published his Traité sur la Tolérance à l’occasion de la mort de Jean Calas (Treatise on Toleration, on the Death of Jean Calas.);
  • On 4 June, the old verdict was nullified by the Court of Cassation, and the family returned to jail briefly to hear the new sentence;
  • A famous engraving, from a drawing by Carmontelle, was sold in order to raise money for the family;
  • In February 1765, David de Beaudrigue, the magistrate, was removed from office;
  • On 9 March 1765, the Calas family was fully rehabilitated.

Read more: http://www.site-magister.com/afcal.htm#ixzz3Ti81O9JP

Conclusion

Voltaire surrounded himself with royals and other influential people. He won the sympathy of French Protestants and Protestants outside France, thus advancing the cause for religious tolerance. He also discredited the judiciary. When Voltaire worked on a case, he was extremely persistent.

Montesquieu published his Spirit of the Laws in 1748, bringing absolutism into disrepute; it seemed despotic. Voltaire proved that the execution of Jean Calas was an injustice. He showed the merciless treatment of Huguenots, French Protestants. He mobilized the whole of Europe, yet, he never left home.

However, Europe was inundated with letters, etc.

I should note in closing that Voltaire loved the theater, he enjoyed acting, wrote several plays. In short, to rehabilitate Calas, it seems he staged a huge drama. He even sent the grieving widow to Paris and to Court. Having prints engraved to move people or to get donations was brilliant. But this is where I must stop.

My best regards to all of you. ♥

RELATED ARTICLES

  • Voltaire: the Story begins (2 March 2015)
  • Relativity & the Rule of Law (22 February 2015)
  • Thoughts on Descartes & the Latest Events (7 February 2015)

Sources and Resources

  • L’Affaire Calas: http://www.site-magister.com/afcal.htm#ixzz3ThtJohrj FR ←
  • Jean Calas, Wikipedia
  • Dechristianization of France during the French Revolution, Wikipedia
  • L’Enquête de Voltaire FR (L’Affaire Calas)
  • French Enlightenment EN
  • Madame Denis (Voltaire’s niece) EN
  • Women’s Involvement in the French Salons (early 18th century) EN
The Age of Reason (Photo Credit: Wikipedia)

The Age of Reason (Photo Credit: Wikipedia)

© Micheline Walker
8 March 2015
WordPress

 

45.403816 -71.938314

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Designing Washington, DC: Pierre-Charles L’Enfant

23 Friday May 2014

Posted by michelinewalker in France, History, The Enlightenment, United States

≈ 11 Comments

Tags

American War of Independence, Anderson House, André Le Nôtre, Masonic layout of Washington, Monticello & UNESCO, Pierre Charles L'Enfant, The Da Vinci Code, The Society of the Cincinnati

Balcony beneath The Apotheosis of Washington (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Balcony beneath “The Apotheosis of Washington,” in the Capitol Rotunda (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Beaumarchais enlists Pierre-Charles L’Enfant

Beaumarchais recruits Pierre-Charles L’Enfant: a coincidence
L’Enfant does not return to France
L’Enfant is initiated into Freemasonry
Washington commissions L’Enfant to be build a capital city
Thomas Jefferson supervises the building of Washington DC
 

Coincidentally, French playwright Pierre-Augustin Caron de Beaumarchais, (24 January 1732 – 18 May 1799), the gentleman who authored The Marriage of Figaro (Le Mariage de Figaro, 1784), recruited soldiers wishing to fight against the British in the American War of Independence (1775 – 1783). Among the men Beaumarchais recruited is major Pierre-Charles L’Enfant (August 9, 1754 – 14 June 1825), an architect and civil engineer who decided to settle in New York after the American War of Independence. In 1791, L’Enfant would be asked, by George Washington, to design what would be the future capital of the United States. George Washington wanted the United States to have an impressive capital city.

The National Mall was the centerpiece of the McMillan Plan.

The National Mall was the centerpiece of the McMillan Plan. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Pierre-Charles in the “Federal City”

George Washington, first President of the United States
George Washington, a Freemason
L’Enfant, a Freemason
 

When Pierre-Charles heard that a capital would be built, he wrote to George Washington asking to be commissioned to do this work, and Washington graciously obliged. Because Washington was a Freemason, he asked L’Enfant to include Masonic symbols in the layout of the city that would eventually be named after him. Freemasonry is not a religion. It is a fraternity. Consequently, integrating Masonic symbols would not violate the Enlightenment ideal of the separation of Church and State, an ideal also promoted by Freemasonry. Again, coincidentally, Pierre-Charles L’Enfant had been initiated in Freemasonry in New York, on 17 April 1789. He could therefore incorporate Masonic symbols in his layout, known as L’Enfant Plan. L’Enfant was never very active as a Freemason but, as an architect and civil engineer, he followed the instructions of his clients, at least to a point. The layout of Washington, D.C. contains Masonic symbols as do some of its buildings.

Wahington, D.C. Pentagram

Washington, D.C. Pentagram (Photo credit: United States Presidents and the Illuminati /Masonic Power Structure)

Masonic and Illuminist elements in the layout of Washington

The layout of Washington, D.C. may indeed feature Masonic elements and reflect the thinking of the Illuminati. George Washington was influenced by the Illuminati or “luminaries,” a movement rooted in the Enlightenment. The George Washington Masonic National Memorial has its Internet entry. On the Internet, one also finds a rather alarming entry entitled Washington D.C. and Masonic/Lucifer Symbology.

Dan Brown: The Da Vinci Code

Parisian Elements

L’Enfant also incorporated in his designs Parisian architectural elements our “Americans in Paris,” Thomas Jefferson in particular, had admired in certain buildings. Consequently, there was a will among members of the former American Delegation to remember their stay in Paris. Like tourists, they brought back “souvenirs.” They did so by inserting Parisian motifs in houses they had built and in their décor. Therefore, Washington, D.C. (District of Columbia) does reflect the involvement of the French in the American War of Independence, but these elements are not necessarily Masonic. I wonder if they visited Vaux-le-Vicomte. There can be no doubt that L’Enfant was inspired by Louis XIV‘s landscape artist André Le Nôtre and noted British architects:

“[t]he influence of Baroque architecture at Versailles, by André Le Nôtre [12 March 1613 – 15 September 1700], appears in his plan and it also bears resemblances to the London plans of Sir Christopher Wren PRS [20 October 1632 – 25 February 1723]  and John Evelyn FRS [31 October 1620 – 27 February 1706].”[ii]

French Coins

French Coins (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Thomas Jefferson as Architect

Supervising L’Enfant was Thomas Jefferson, whose home at Monticello Jefferson designed and redesigned personally. It included architectural features that had caught his eye in Paris. In fact, Monticello is a historical landmark and, in 1987, it was designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Jefferson also designed the University of Virginia, the first buildings. Jefferson had a passion for architecture.

“Thomas Jefferson, who worked alongside President Washington in overseeing the plans for the capital, sent L’Enfant a letter outlining his task for the capital which was to provide a drawing of suitable sites for the federal city and the public buildings. Though Jefferson had modest ideas for the Capital, L’Enfant saw the task as far more grandiose, believing he was not only locating the capital, but also devising the city plan and designing the buildings.” (See Pierre-Charles L’Enfant, Wikipedia.)

Problems arose. Allow me to quote Wikipedia:

“L’Enfant was supervised by three commissioners. In February 1792, Andrew Ellicott, who was conducting the original boundary survey of the future District of Columbia (see Boundary Stones [District of Columbia]) and the survey of the “Federal City” under the direction of the Commissioners, informed the Commissioners that L’Enfant had not been able to have the city plan engraved and had refused to provide him with the original plan (of which L’Enfant had prepared several versions.” (See Pierre-Charles L’Enfant, Wikipedia.)

Andrew Ellicott

Andrew Ellicott had not been commissioned to design the layout of the future Washington, D.C., but he took over the project and modified L’Enfant Plan. George Washington dismissed L’Enfant without remuneration for the work he had carried out. Later on, L’Enfant would be remunerated, though barely so: $3,800, enough to pay a few creditors. After leaving the “Federal City,” L’Enfant surveyed and platted Indianapolis, Indiana, and Perrysburg, Ohio, but he was now in disgrace and would die in poverty. When he grew old, friends provided a refuge at Green Hill, a Maryland estate in Chillum, Prince George’s County. Chillum is where L’Enfant was first buried.

The McMillan Commission (1901-1902)

Pierre-Charles Rehabilitated
The National Mall
Pennsylvania Avenue
The Capitol Building
The “Grand Avenue” 
 

The future would bring recognition to L’Enfant. In 1901 and 1902, his plans were used by the McMillan Commission “as the cornerstone of a report that recommended a partial redesign of the capital city. Among other things, the Commission’s report laid out a plan for a sweeping mall in the area of L’Enfant’s widest ‘grand avenue’, which had not been constructed.” (See c, Wikipedia.)

The Society of the Cincinnati (1783)

The Society of the Cincinnati
La Société des Cincinnati de France
Louis XVI ordains the Society of the Cincinnati
The French ‘connection’
 

In the course of his career, Pierre-Charles, an aristocrat by birth, had become “Peter.” Thomas Jefferson had asked him to paint a portrait of George Washington. He also designed the badge for the Society of the Cincinnati, a society commemorating the involvement of France in the American War of Independence. L’Enfant would also establish a French branch of the Society, La Société des Cincinnati de France, ordained by Louis XVI. The Society of the Cincinnati is a “hereditary, military, and patriotic organization formed in May 1783 by officers who had served in the American Revolution. Its objectives were to promote union and national honours, maintain their war-born friendship, perpetuate the rights for which they had fought, and aid members of their families in case of need.”[iii]  The Society of the Cincinnati also remains a testimonial honouring the presence of the French in America during the American Revolutionary War, which is its most important role. France was impoverished, but its military wanted to fight for the independence of the United States and Louis XVI signed the Treaty of Alliance (1778) with France. George Washington would be elected the Society’s first President and its headquarters are the Larz and Isabel Anderson House in Washington, D.C..

Conclusion

Jean-Jules Jusserand
Lying in State, the Capitol rotunda
Pierre-Charles re-interred
Arlington National Cemetery, Virginia
 

At the request of Jean Jules Jusserand, a French Ambassador to the United States during World War I, the United States recognized L’Enfant’s contributions to his adopted nation. In 1909, after lying in state at the Capitol rotunda, L’Enfant’s remains were re-interred in the Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia. L’Enfant’s name is included in the list provided by Wikipedia (The Society of the Cincinnati). La Fayette is listed as Gilbert du Motier and Pierre-Charles L’Enfant, as Pierre L’Enfant. (See The Society of the Cincinnati, Wikipedia.) “At his first inauguration in 1791, President Washington took his oath of office on a Bible from St. John’s Lodge in New York. During his two terms, he visited Masons in North and South Carolina and presided over the cornerstone ceremony for the U.S. Capitol in 1793.”  (See George Washington Masonic National Memorial.)

(Photo credit: Google images)

The Society of the Cincinnati (Photo credit: Google images)

RELATED ARTICLES

  • Americans in Paris: George Washington (22 May 2014)
  • Americans in Paris: Thomas Jefferson (17 May 2014)
  • Americans in Paris: Benjamin Franklin (14 May 2014)

Sources and Resources:

BBC History: The American War of Independence: The Rebels and the Redcoats,
by Professor Richard Holmes
L’Enfant Plan is an online document
The Masonic Career of Major Pierre-Charles L’Enfant, by Pierre F. de Ravel d’Esclapon, 32°, Valley of Rockville Center, N.Y. (March-April 2011)
Washington, the Mason: http://gwmemorial.org/washingtonTheMason.php
United States Presidents and the Illuminati/Masonic Power Structure, by Robert Howard
George Washington Masonic National Memorial
The Masonic Trowel
Washington D.C. and Masonic/Lucifer Symbology
The Society of the Cincinnati
La Société des Cincinnati de France
The Larz and Isabel Anderson House

_________________________

[i] “[A]t Holland Lodge No. 8 F&AM, which the Grand Lodge of New York F&AM had chartered in 1787. L’Enfant took only the first of three degrees offered by the lodge and did not progress further in Freemasonry.” (See Pierre-Charles L’Enfant, Wikipedia.)    
[ii] “Pierre Charles L’Enfant”. Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2014. Web. 22 May. 2014
<http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/335841/Pierre-Charles-LEnfant>.
[iii] The “Society of the Cincinnati”.  Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2014. Web. 22 May. 2014 <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/117977/Society-of-the-Cincinnati>. 
 
Gershwin plays “Swanee”
 

Monticello

Jefferson’s Monticello

Pete Seeger sings “Way down upon the Suwannee River,” by Stephen Foster 
 
 

1

© Micheline Walker
22 May 2014
WordPress 
 
The insignia of the Society of the Cincinnati 
(Photo credit: Google Images)

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Americans in Paris: Thomas Jefferson

17 Saturday May 2014

Posted by michelinewalker in The Enlightenment, The French Revolution, The United States

≈ 8 Comments

Tags

American War of Independence, Assembly of Notables, Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen, Marquis de La Fayette, Tax reforms, the United States, Thomas Jefferson, Vicomte de Calonne

 

Stone sign affixed on the rue Jacob building
Stone sign affixed on the rue Jacob building (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

In this building, formerly the York Hotel [Paris], on 3 September 1783, David Hartley, in the name of the king of England, and Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams, in the name of the United States of America, signed the definitive peace treaty recognizing the independence of the United States.

 —ooo—

Five years after Louis XVI hesitatingly signed the Treaty of Alliance (1778), which  ensured the future independence of a country to be named the United States of America, the Treaty of Versailles (sometimes called the Treaty of Paris) was signed at the Hôtel  d’York in Paris, a hotel that no longer exists, the above stone sign commemorates the victory of the young Republic. The Treaty of Versailles proclaimed the independence of the United States.

When the Treaty of Versailles was signed, in 1783, Thomas Jefferson had yet to assume his duties as United States Minister Plenipotentiary to France, an office now  known as that of Ambassador. Moreover, and ironically, France itself would not become a republic until 22 September 1792, and not under the best of circumstances.

The names engraved on the stone shown above are those of members of the American Delegation in Paris, architects of the United States of America:

  • Benjamin Franklin  (17 January 1706 – 17 April 1790), the “first American,” and perhaps the main artisan of an independent United States;
  • John Jay (12 December 1745 – 17 May 1829), of the American Delegation, the 2nd Governor of New York and an opponent of slavery;
  • John Adams (30 October 1735 – 4 July 1826), also of the American Delegation in Paris and the second President of the United States of America.

Representing Britain was David Hartley, King George III‘s plenipotentiary.

King George III of England, by Allan Ramsay

King George III of the United Kingdom, by Allan Ramsay (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Aftermath

It could be said that all parties gained from the Treaty of Versailles/Paris. The United States was an independent nation and Benjamin Franklin had made sure both France and England would be its trading partners. As for France, it had regained the prestige it lost when it ceded Canada to Britain under the terms of the Treaty of Paris, signed in 1673, but Canada remained a British colony. However, in 1783, Benjamin Franklin did glance northwards. The mostly French-language British Province of Quebec shrank significantly. Please see the maps.[i]

Expansion

The United States would expand, but it would be to the west rather than the north. In 1803, under the presidency of Thomas Jefferson, the United States would purchase Louisiana from France. Again, ironically, the groundwork for the Louisiana Purchase, was one of Thomas Jefferson’s contributions to the United States as Minister to France. Jefferson had kept alive an alliance with France. The French did not look upon the sale of Louisiana as a severe loss. Louisiana had been disputed territory between France and Spain and the United States needed a port to the south. In short, France would have lost Louisiana. It may therefore have been in its best interest to sell it. Am I writing this?

Thomas Jefferson, by Rembrandt Peale

Thomas Jefferson, by Rembrandt Peale (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Thomas Jefferson

In May 1785, Thomas Jefferson (13 April 1743 – 4 July 1826), the 3rd President of the United States and a good friend of the Marquis de La Fayette, was installed as the United States Minister, or United States ‘Ambassador’ to France. Like his predecessor, Benjamin Franklin, Jefferson was a polymath who had read abundantly, played the violin, spoke several languages, but suffered violent attacks of migraine. He was a man of the Enlightenment and truly impressed the French, but not in the same manner as his predecessor, Benjamin Franklin, who was milling financial and military support for the American Revolutionary War, and did so as a “regular” in various French Salons and the Café Procope, major institutions in France, and importing racoon hats, “du nouveau,” something new, for the ladies of the French court and Salons. These ladies only wore the “trendy” and would not be caught otherwise. The French did however name Benjamin Franklin to the French Academy as an honorary member. As for Jefferson, his legacy would be one of the mind, to the French and to the world. I will not speak of his dependence on slaves.

Thomas Jefferson arrived in Paris in 1785 and left on 26 September 1789 in order to serve as the United States’ first Secretary of State, under George Washington (22 February 1732  – 14 December 1799). In other words, Jefferson left France a mere two weeks before Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord, Prince de Talleyrand suggested, on 10 October 1789, that France resolve its financial crisis by confiscating the wealth of Church, which it did on 2 November 1789. During his stay in Paris, Jefferson was a witness to vain attempts on the part of Louis XVI to pay the huge debt accrued mainly because of wars it had fought, one of which was the American Revolutionary War. The American Revolutionary War was indeed a catalyst in the apocalyptic French Revolution. France had supported the future United States’ effort to break its ties with Britain. But who could have predicted a catastrophe that would ignore the liberalism of the Age of Enlightenment to persecute the clergy and the nobility, by killing thousands of its innocent citizens?

The American Declaration of Independence

Franklin was in France to rally the French to the American cause of independence from England. Such would not be Jefferson’s task. Given that he had drafted the American Declaration of Independence, a text reflecting the liberalism of John Locke, Thomas Jefferson’s main contribution to the French Revolution would be the lofty idealism he had contributed to the American Declaration of Independence, which he had drafted almost single-handedly. Jefferson was in a position to play an active role in the actual drafting of the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen (Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen), a pivotal text in the history of France, written mainly by Jefferson’s friend, La Fayette, with assistance on the part of Thomas Jefferson, and issued on 26 August 1789, a month to the day before Jefferson left France to take up his duties as first American Secretary of State.

The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen is derivative. It is rooted in John Locke’s principles and, to a substantial extent, in Jean-Jacques Rousseau‘s Social Contract (1762), as is the American Declaration of Independence. At the very heart of the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen is Jefferson’s “all men are created equal,” not in so many words, but in spirit. Equality was part of the motto of the French Revolution: liberté, égalité, fraternité, and it remains part of the motto of France. However it left room for a constitutional monarchy, the initial goal of the French Revolution. No one could have predicted such incivility as the Civil Constitution of the Clergy. Nor could anyone have foreseen that the French Revolution would spin out of control to the point of regicide: the execution of Louis XVI.

Le Pressoir

Le Pressoir (The Pressurizer) (Photo credit: Google Images)

George Washington: the “Proclamation of Neutrality”

On 22 April 1793, after the execution of king Louis XVI (21 January 1793), George Washington issued a Proclamation of Neutrality. The United States declared it would remain neutral in conflicts between France and Great Britain and in Wars abroad. Americans breaking this rule could be prosecuted. (See Proclamation of Neutrality, Wikipedia.) Yet, the American Revolutionary War or American War of Independence, was a catalyst in the apocalyptic French Revolution. France had been the main financial and military supporter in the Americans’ effort to break their ties with Britain. But, again, who could have imagined a catastrophe that would ignore the liberalism of the Enlightenment and persecute the clergy and the nobility.

Therefore, would that the Parliament of Paris had ratified Charles Alexandre, vicomte de Calonne‘s proposal of imposing taxes across the board. Would, moreover, that the Assembly of Notables, created by Louis XVI, in 1787, had seen fit to implement universal taxation. Levying taxes from the First and Second Estates, the Church of France and its nobility, was the only solution to France’s financial crisis. Its participation in the American War of Independence cost France 1.3 billion livres.

In 1787, the Parliament of Paris refused to register Charles Alexandre, vicomte de Calonne‘s[ii] proposal to tax all three estates, the only way to remedy France’s desperate financial crisis. Louis XVI therefore created an Assembly of Notables, 144 individuals handpicked by him, whose duty it would be to save France from bankruptcy. The Marquis de La Fayette was a member of king Louis XVI’s Notables, but Louis’ élite team also refused across-the-board taxation. It was proposed, instead, that the matter of tax reform be handled by the Estates-General which had not convened since 1614.

“While the an [sic] Assembly of Notables had no legislative power in its own right, Calonne hoped that if the Assembly of Notables could be made to support the proposed reforms then this would apply pressure on parlement to register them. The plan failed, as the 144 Notables who made up the Assembly included Princes of the Blood, archbishops, nobles and other people from privileged positions in society, and they did not wish to bear the burden of increased taxation. The Assembly insisting that the proposed tax reforms had to be presented to a representative body such as an Estates General.” (See Assembly of Notables, in Wikipedia)  
 

Conclusion

To end this post, one could state that “the rest is history.” But it need be retold that, on 10 October 1789, Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand (and the Comte de Mirabeau) proposed that France confiscate the wealth of the Church and convert it into assignats: paper money, which was approved by the Assembly on 2 December 1789. Calonne’s proposal that all Estates be taxed turned into greater misery, the confiscation of the property of the Church of France. To harm the Church of France further, Talleyrand, a member of the clergy, l’évêque d’Autun (the bishop of Autun), also proposed the Civil Constitution of the Clergy, a law passed on 12 July 1790. The Civil Constitution of the Clergy did not separate separate Church and State, a separation proposed by the Baron de Montesquieu, among others. Laïcité was part of the programme of the Enlightenment, but the Civil Constitution of the Clergy subjugated the Church of France to the State, which  was not laïcité.

By 12 July 1790, Thomas Jefferson was no longer the American Minister to France. His mission terminated on 26 September 1789, as indicated above.

To sum up, I need simply say that Thomas Jefferson was in Paris as he was in the United States: a superior mind. The video is about Thomas Jefferson.[iii]

Preliminary Treaty of Paris (Photo Credit: Wikipedia)

Preliminary Treaty of Paris (Photo Credit: Wikipedia)

____________________

[i] The Treaty of Versailles (1783) and the Redrawing of the Canada-US Border (Site for Language Management in Canada [SMLC]).

[ii] Calonne was Louis XVI’s Controller-General of Finances. He was appointed to this office in 1783. Jacques Necker, however, remained in the background.

[iii] Here is the text (short) of Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence (just click). It completes the video.

Monticello, Jefferson's home designed by Jefferson

Monticello, Jefferson’s home designed by Jefferson (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

© Micheline Walker
17 May 2014
WordPress 

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

On Madame de Staël

12 Wednesday Mar 2014

Posted by michelinewalker in Literature, Salons, The Enlightenment, The French Revolution

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

Benjamin Constant, Coppet, Exile, Jacques Necker, Madame de Staël, Napoleon's fears, Salons, Suzanne Curchod

Le Château de Coppet
Le Château de Coppet, Madame de Staël’s residence on the shores of Lake Geneva (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

untitled

Madame de Staël, the daughter of Swiss-born Jacques Necker (30 September 1732 – 9 April 1804), Louis XVI’s Finance Minister, is a legendary figure. For one thing, Napoleon I was so afraid of her that he would not let her live in or near Paris. She was born in Paris, but, in 1784, her father had bought a lovely home in Switzerland, on the shores of Lake Geneva. When Germaine de Staël was exiled from France, by Napoleon Bonaparte, Napoleon I, she took refuge at Coppet.

Germaine de Staël

French-Swiss Anne Louise Germaine de Staël (22 April 1766 – 14 July 1817; aged 51), may well be the most prominent intellectual, and salonnière (salonist) of her era, an era that spans the French Revolution, Napoleon’s Empire (Napoléon I) and the beginning of the Bourbon restoration. After Napoleon’s defeat, France was a monarchy, but not an absolute monarchy. It had to be a Constitutional Monarchy, or a form of parliamentary Monarchy, as was the wish of the signatories of the Tennis Court Oath. Madame de Staël joined the National Assembly, constituted by members of the Third Estate, le tiers-état, from rich bourgeois to impoverished peasants still living on feudal seigneuries and paying taxes. The National Assembly (13, 1789 to July 9, 1789) was soon replaced by the Legislative Assembly, which takes us to 1792 and the National Convention. It lasted from 21 September 1792 to 26 October 1795, or 28 July 1794, when Robespierre and Saint-Just were guillotined. (See The French Revolution, Wikipedia.)  

Suzanne Curchod and Jacques Necker

Madame de Staël is the daughter of Suzanne Curchod (1737 – 6 May 1794), a salonnière whose salon could be compared favorably to the salon where Madame Geoffrin (26 June 1699 – 6 October 1777), the daughter of a banker who had entertained and dined distinguished guests on Monday and on Wednesday. Salonnières had “days.” Madame Geoffrin, the finest hostess of the Age of Enlightenment, attracted to her salon the leading intellectual, literary, artistic and political figures of the Age of Enlightenment, and, among them, Voltaire, a Freemason, encyclopédistes Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d’Alembert and, to a significant degree, Jean-Jacques Rousseau (28 June 1712 – 2 July 1778), an encyclopédiste who challenged the reign of reason and is, therefore, a precursor, if not the founder, of Romanticism. Remember La Querelle des Bouffons.

Nearly a generation later, during the 1770s and 178Os, madame Necker’s salon du vendredi, the Friday salon, would attract exceptional figures, one of whom, Jean-François Marmontel, has been somewhat neglected by posterity. Marmontel was secretary-for-life (lifetime) of the Neuf Sœurs (The Nine Sisters), the leading Masonic Lodge of the Grand Orient of France. Moreover, from 1771 until 1793, Louis-Philippe II, Duke of Orleans (Philippe Égalité) was its Grand Master. France also had English-speaking lodges.

Madame Necker also entertained Swiss expatriates Madame Geoffrin and the Marquise du Deffand. When Madame Necker left Paris, in 1790, she missed her salon. Four years later, she died.

Suzanne Curchod Necker

Suzanne Curchod Necker

Jacques Necker, by Joseph Duplessis (Château de Versailles) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Jacques Necker, by Joseph Duplessis (Château de Versailles) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

As for Madame de Staël’s father, Swiss-born Jacques Necker (30 September 1732 – 9 April 1804), he was Louis XVI’s finance minister (1788–89, 1789–90). Jacques Necker had become extremely wealthy, richissime in fact, during the Seven Year’s War. He made savvy speculations, perhaps not altogether above-board, but speculations that earned him a fortune and put him in a position to lend money to the Crown, so to speack, In 1764, he married Suzanne Curchod (1739 – 1794) put him in a position to lend money to the “Crown,” so to speak. In 1764, he married Suzanne Curchod (1739 – 1794),the cultivated daughter of a Vaudois* pastor who was considering marrying historian Edward Gibbon. Suzanne Necker became a prominent salonnière or salonist.

*from the Swiss Canton (township) of Vaud

Jacques Necker, a Protestant, would not allow his beloved daughter Germaine to marry a Catholic. In 1786, Madame de Staël was therefore married to the Swedish ambassador in Paris, Baron Erik de Staël-Holstein. It was, of course, a marriage of convenience, ended formally in 1797, but Madame de Staël was now at court, meeting statesmen. Madame de Staël and Erik de Staël had four children, three of whom survived childhood: Auguste (b. 1790), who edited his mother’s complete works; Albert (b. 1792); and Albertine (b. 1796). Albertine married Victor de Broglie, 9th Prime Minister of France. Gustavine (b. 1887) died in 1789.

One of the children may have been fathered by Benjamin Constant (25 October 1767 – 8 December 1830), the author of Adolphe (1816) and, for some 14 years (1794 – 1809), Madame de Staël’s lover. He and Madame de Staël shared the same liberal views. Benjamin’s writings were influenced by Karl Wilhelm Friedrich von Schlegel and his brother August Wilhem Schlegel, who were leading “Romantics.” (See Romanticism, Wikipedia.)

Madame de Staël had a fifth child, Alphonse, born in 1812 when Germaine was 46. In all likelihood, he was fathered by Albert de Rocca who legitimated him as Louis- Alphonse Rocca. Albert was twenty-three years younger than madame de Staël’s. The couple married after Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo and lived in Paris. Although sources differ concerning the date on which the marriage took place, my best information is that Albert de Rocca and Germaine de Staël married on 10 October 1816. She had a seizure in early 1817 and died on July 14, 1817. Albert de Rocca suffered from tuberculosis. He died on 31 January 1818.

Madame de Staël & Napoleon

The coup d’état of 18 Brumaire (9 November 1799) had made Bonaparte the self-declared head of state, in France (see Napoleon, Wikipedia), a position he consolidated in 1804 by proclaiming himself and his Créole wife, Joséphine, Emperor and Empress of France, leaving no voice to the people. After the execution of Louis XVI, madame de Staël therefore switched to moderate Republicanism.

Having read her writings, I would suspect that, intellectually, Madame de Staël may have been Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord‘s equal, except that their roles differed. Madame de Staël was a political thinker, but Talleyrand, a shrewd politician, a survivor, and Napoleon’s éminence grise, to a point. However, although Napoleon Bonaparte    proved quite an adroit statesman, he was, first and foremost, an extraordinary general, which brought both his rise and his demise. Moreover, he had taken possession of France, not to mention Europe.

At any rate, a rather cowardly Napoleon had madame de Staël chased throughout Europe and banished her. Her refuge was the Château de Coppet, on Lake Léman (Lake Geneva), the property purchased by Jacques Necker, Madame de Staël’s doting father, in 1784. Germaine spent approximately ten years, at Coppet which she described as her Dix années d’exil (Ten Years of Exile). Scholar Mona Ozouf[i] speaks of Madame de Staël’s inquiétude (worriness). Who would catch her when she fell: “descendre sans appui” (to fall without support)? She did not moan, except privately, and in her Dix années d’exil (published posthumously, in 1821, as were other works), but isolation was a major burden to a conversationalist, hence the title of her book on her banishment: Dix années d’exil. Madame de Staël was a woman, a wife, and a mother who dared to write. (Ozouf, p. 121)

Madame de Staël (1766 - 1817),  Firmin Massot

Madame de Staël (1766 – 1817), Firmin Massot

Le Groupe de Coppet

However, unexpectedly, during the ten years (an approximate number) Madame de Staël spent at Coppet, Coppet, not Paris, was the appropriate destination for men of letters, intellectuals, writers and various  dignitaries.  Helen Phillio Jenkins[ii] quotes French novelist Stendhal, the pen name of Marie-Henri Beyle (23 January 1783 – 23 March, 1842. Stendhal is the author of Le Rouge et le Noir (1830) and many classics of 19th-century French literature. The Red and the Black is on my list of future posts. Stendhal describes a triumphant summer feast in 1816, Madame de Staël’s last summer.  

“There was here on the coast of Lake Geneva last autumn the most astonishing reunion. It was the states general of European opinion. The phenomenon rises even to political importance. There were here six hundred persons, the most distinguished of Europe. Men of intellect, of wealth, of the greatest titles–all came here to seek pleasure in the salon of the illustrious woman for whom France weeps today.” The Review Politique, 1880, says: “It was a parliament whence came forth political doctrines, a race [breed] of statesmen, a school of thinkers, which have filled with their combats, their triumphs or their defeats, more than half a century of our history.”[iii]

Romanticism

No, although she grieved, Germaine did not moan. She learned German and took an interest in German Romanticism. She met Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (28 August 1749 – 22 March 1832) known as Goethe, and Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller (10 November 1759 – 9 May 1805), known as Friedrich Schiller. She is therefore associated with Sturm und Drang (late 1760s to early 1780s). 

However, Madame de Staël’s knowledge of Geneva-born Jean-Jacques Rousseau‘s  (28 June 1712 – 2 July 1778) works had fully prepared her to understand and to contribute to the development of European Romanticism. Madame de Staël had studied Rousseau and written about his works: 1) Letters on the Works and the Character of J.-J. Rousseau (1788). Although Madame de Staël had published two works before she was 21, she entered the world of letters when she started writing analytical works: political theory, literary theory, thoughts on various subjects, sociology avant la lettre:

  1. Lettres sur les ouvrages et le caractère de Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1788) ;
  2. De l’influence des passions sur le bonheur des individus et des nations (1796) ;
  3. De la littérature considérée dans ses rapports avec les institutions sociales (1800).

Jean-Jacques had rehabilitated sentiment, a subject debated from the day René Descartes published, in French, his Discours de la Méthode (1637). By and large, seminal ideas stem from intuition, but are then examined methodically. 

As for Madame de Staël, she wrote 2) A Treatise on the Influence of the Passions upon the Happiness of Individuals and of Nations, published in 1796. French-Swiss Benjamin Constant, the author of Adolphe (1816) and Madame de Staël’s lover, also studied sentiment.

Madame de Staël is also the author of 3) The Influence of Literature upon Society (1800). It’s a fascinating topic. However, Madame de Staël’s De l’Allemagne (Germany), written between 1810 and 1813, is her magnum opus. Yet, her novel entitled Delphine (1802), is also a classic. 

Conclusion

In this post, we have seen Germaine de Staël as an intellectual and a salonnière, but a salonnière who played an active role in the conversation and was a thinker. She was in fact, both hostess and guest, and her guests included such individuals as Lord Byron, the Duke of Wellington, Madame Récamier.

She was a novelist, Delphine (1802)and Corinne (1807), but, first and foremost a thinker. Philosopher Auguste Comte, the father of sociology, included her in his “Calender of Great Men.”

In literature, she helped create a new hero well-exemplified by Chateaubriand‘s René, a French Werther, Goethe’s Werther. Our new hero suffers from le mal du siècle and le vague des passions. He stands tall compared to the rest of humanity, but he lives in a garret, his genius unrecognized. Reason had not been crushed, but it had been carefully circumscribed.

Politically, moderation guided her thinking.  After the execution of Louis XVI, she was a moderate Republican. In fact, she was always a moderate.

And then comes Coppet, the unrivalled meeting-place of Europe’s intellectual elite. Whenever I think of Madame de Staël, she is in Coppet.

—ooo—

RELATED ARTICLE

  • Giovanni Battista Pergolesi, revisited

Sources:  

  • Descartes: The Discourse on Method, Project Gutenberg [EBook #59]EN
  • Benjamin Constant: Adolphe, Project Gutenberg [EBook #13861]EN
  • Staël Delphine (1802), Project Gutenberg  [EBook #7812]EN
  • Madame de Staël: Corinne, or Italy (1807)EN
  • De l’Allemagne (1810-1803) may be read online (a 1852 edition).FR
  • De l’Allemagne, edited by Henri Heine, is an online publication.FR
  • Madame de Staël: De l’Allemagne, translated by Heinrich Heine (Amazon)EN
  • Considerations on the Principal Events of the French Revolution (1818) (Amazon)EN
  • Paul Gautier: Chateaubriand et madame de Staël (Revue des Deux Mondes, Tome 17, 1903 Chateaubriand et madame de Staël d’après les lettres inédites de Chateaubriand (1903)FR
  • Paul Gautier: Madame de Staël et Napoléon (1904)
  • Édouard Hérriot (1872 – 1957): Madame Récamier et ses amis
  • Video:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2gmVKMvBV0  (Michel Winock sur Madame de Staël)FR
  • art:  Varvara Ivanovna Narishkine, by Vigée Le Brun, 1801

Please accept my apologies for the long absence.  I was not feeling well. Kind regards to all of you.

_________________________

[i] Mona Ozouf, Les Mots des femmes ; essai sur la singularité française (Paris : Fayard, 1995), p. 113.

[ii] Helen Philleo Jenkins, “Madame de Stael,” in Mary Kavanaugh Oldham, ed. The Congress of Women: Held in the Woman’s Buiding, World’s Columbia Exposition, Chicago, U. S. A. 1893 (Chicago: Monarch Book Company, 1894), pp. 686-690).

Johann Baptist Vanhal, (12 May 1739 – 20 August 1813)
Symphony in G minor, II Adagio

MADAME~1

© Micheline Walker

12 March 2014

WordPress 
 
 
Madame de Staël as Corinne,
Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Social Contract: Hobbes, Locke & Rousseau

13 Saturday Oct 2012

Posted by michelinewalker in Political Philosophy, The Enlightenment

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Age of Enlightenment, Aristotle, De Cive, J. Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Social Contract, Thomas Hobbes

 
 
Imaginary View of the Grande Galerie in the Louvre in Ruins by Hubert Robert (Photo credit: Web Gallery of Art)
 
 
“I transfer my right of governing myself to X (the sovereign) if you do too.” (Thomas Hobbes)
 
English: Thomas Hobbes Македонски: Томас Хобс ...

Thomas Hobbes, John Locke & Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Although political thinking dates back to antiquity, the only political philosophers discussed in this post are closer to us and all express the need for a Social Contract. I will first provide a comprehensive definition of the Social Contract and suggest you that you complete this summary by clicking on Social Contract.

Du Contrat social (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Definition

Wikipedia defines the social contract as follows:

“In political philosophy the social contract or political contract is a theory or model, originating during the Age of Enlightenment, that typically addresses the questions of the origin of society and the legitimacy of the authority of the state over the individual. Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate (or to the decision of a majority), in exchange for protection of their remaining rights. The question of the relation between natural and legal rights, therefore, is often an aspect of Social Contract theory.” (Social Contract)

The Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century

Thomas Hobbes

Thomas Hobbes or Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (5 April 1588 – 4 December 1679), effected a revolution.  He broke away from Aristotle on the subject of human nature.  In De Cive Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Government and Society, written in 1651, he claimed that in the state of nature, man did not behave in a morally acceptable manner.  Hobbes better known work on political philosophy is his Leviathan, also published in 1651.  But in De Cive (The Citizen) Thomas Hobbes makes it clear that societies require a civilizing force he calls the Social Contract.  The full text of De Cive, in English translation and edited by Jon Roland is online.  To read it, click on De Cive.

According to the Encyclopædia Britannica, “[a]fter only a few paragraphs, Hobbes rejects one of the most famous theses of Aristotle’s politics, namely that human beings are naturally suited to life in a polis and do not fully realize their natures until they exercise the role of citizen. Hobbes turns Aristotle’s claim on its head: human beings, he insists, are by nature unsuited to political life.”[i]

Thomas Hobbes’s De Cive and his Leviathan (1651) open the debate on the notion of the Social Contract, a term he was the first to use.  Thomas Hobbes believed that “in a state of nature each person would have a right, or license, to everything in the world. This, Hobbes argues, would lead to a ‘war of all against all’ (bellum omnium contra omnes).”  In other words, in a state of nature, each person would be free “to plunder, rape, and murder.”  Hence the need for a social contract that ensures safety.  “The social contract was an ‘occurrence’ during which individuals came together and ceded some of their individual rights so that others would cede theirs.” (Social Contract, Wikipedia)

John Locke

John Locke (29 August 1632 – 28 October 1704) held a kinder view of human nature.  According to Locke, human nature is characterised by reason and tolerance.  In a state of nature, all people were equal and independent, and everyone had a natural right to defend his ‘Life, health, Liberty, or Possessions’.”

Yet, Locke did not think that, in a state of nature, man could defend his life, health, liberty and possessions. He therefore advocated a Social Contract.  In other words,  although John Locke’s view of human nature is less pessimistic than Hobbes’, his political theory is nonetheless founded on a Social Contract ensuring the safety of individuals.  For John Locke, the innate rights of man were life, liberty and property.

John Locke was influenced by Anthony Ashley Cooper, later 1st Earl of Shaftesbury, who “stood for constitutional monarchy, a Protestant succession, civil liberty, toleration in religion, the rule of Parliament.”[ii]

Locke believed in the divine right of kings and defines power as a “right of making Laws with Penalties of Death, and consequently all less Penalties, for the Regulating and Preserving of Property, and of employing the force of the Community, in the Execution of such Laws and in defence of the Common-wealth from Foreign Injury, and all this only for the Publick Good.”[iii]

Locke is considered the father of Classical Liberalism which advocates representative government and various civil liberties.  His major works on political philosophy are his Two Treatises of Government, published anonymously in 1689.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

For his part, Rousseau believed in innate goodness in man (see Émile, Or Treatise on Education [Émile ou De l’éducation]).  Yet he was also in favor of establishing a Civil Society.

For Jean-Jacques Rousseau (28 June 1712 – 2 July 1778), “[the Social Contract] can be reduced to the following terms: Each of us puts his person and all his power in common under the supreme direction of the general will; and in a body we receive each member as an indivisible part of the whole. (Wikipedia)  Liberty is not otherwise possible. Man must be “forced to be free.” (The Social Contract)

Rousseau’s theory, the body, is called collectivism.  “The earliest modern, influential expression of collectivist ideas in the West is in Jean-Jacques Rousseau ’s Du contrat social, of 1762 (see Social Contract), in which it is argued that the individual finds his true being and freedom only in submission to the ‘general will’ of the community.” (Britannica)[iv] However, the ruler is the general will (la volonté générale) or the people viewed as a collectivity.  But the general will needs a government and laws.

Rousseau did not approve of a representative government.  He preferred a direct government.  The citizens of Geneva–Rousseau was born in Geneva–lived in a small city-state where representation could be direct, at least to a point.

So although Rousseau believed in innate goodness in man, he also believed in man’s corruptibility.  He therefore wished to avoid terrifying anarchy by entering into a social contract and insisted on legislation.  In other words, he agrees that men must “surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate (or to the decision of a majority), in exchange for protection of their remaining rights.”

Rousseau’s Social Contract is an online publication.  Simply click on Social Contract.

—ooo—

All of the above is inspiring, but it would be my opinion that most relevant at the moment is the notion of individual needs versus collective needs.  The two seem inseparable in a healthy social contract.  How brilliant of Thomas Hobbes to have used the words the social contract.

_________________________

[i] Political Philosophy, The Encyclopædia Britannica online, accessed on 13 October 2012
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/268448/Thomas-Hobbes/275880/Political-philosophy 
 
[ii] John Locke,The Encyclopædia Britannica online, accessed on 13 October 2012
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/345753/John-Locke/59085/Association-with-Shaftesbury
 
[iii] John Locke, The Encyclopaedia Britannica online, accessed on 13 October 2012
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/345753/John-Locke/280602/Two-Treatises-of-Government
 
[iv] Collectivism, The Encyclopædia Britannica online, accessed on 13 October 2012
 
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/125584/collectivism#ref256673
 
 
composer: Giuseppe Tartini (1692 – 1770) 
piece: Concerto for violin, strings, and basso continuo in A major D. 96, 2&3 mvt
performers: Venice Baroque Orchestra, Giuliano Carmignola, violin
conductor:  Andrea Marcon

430px-Jean-Jacques_Rousseau_(painted_portrait)

© Micheline Walker
13 October 2012
WordPress 
 
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
by Maurice Quentin de La Tour
1753
45.408358 -71.934658

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Europa

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,510 other subscribers

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Winter Scenes
  • Epiphany 2023
  • Pavarotti sings Schubert’s « Ave Maria »
  • Yves Montand chante “À Bicyclette”
  • Almost ready
  • Bicycles for Migrant Farm Workers
  • Tout Molière.net : parti …
  • Remembering Belaud
  • Monet’s Magpie
  • To Lori Weber: Language Laws in Quebec, 2

Archives

Calendar

April 2023
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« Feb    

Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • WordPress.org

micheline.walker@videotron.ca

Micheline Walker

Micheline Walker

Social

Social

  • View belaud44’s profile on Facebook
  • View Follow @mouchette_02’s profile on Twitter
  • View Micheline Walker’s profile on LinkedIn
  • View belaud44’s profile on YouTube
  • View Miicheline Walker’s profile on Google+
  • View michelinewalker’s profile on WordPress.org

Micheline Walker

Micheline Walker
Follow Micheline's Blog on WordPress.com

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

  • Follow Following
    • Micheline's Blog
    • Join 2,478 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Micheline's Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: