• Aboriginals in North America
  • Beast Literature
  • Canadiana.1
  • Dances & Music
  • Europe: Ukraine & Russia
  • Fables and Fairy Tales
  • Fables by Jean de La Fontaine
  • Feasts & Liturgy
  • Great Books Online
  • La Princesse de Clèves
  • Middle East
  • Molière
  • Nominations
  • Posts on Love Celebrated
  • Posts on the United States
  • The Art and Music of Russia
  • The French Revolution & Napoleon Bonaparte
  • Voyageurs Posts
  • Canadiana.2

Micheline's Blog

~ Art, music, books, history & current events

Micheline's Blog

Monthly Archives: September 2011

Ahmadinejab: dirty games

29 Thursday Sep 2011

Posted by michelinewalker in The Middle East

≈ 7 Comments

Tags

Agent provocateur, Ahmadinejad, conspiracy, dangerous lunatic, dirty games, East meets West, The Metropolitan Museum, WordPress

 

Islamic Tile

 

Let me return to a quotation I borrowed from Marcus Aurelius in an earlier blog entitled “Those who came back.”  I had stated that in his Meditations, Roman Emperor and philosopher Marcus Aurelius (121-180 CE) had written: “To stand up – or to be set up?” (7:1).

Well, this morning, on Radio-Canada, the French-language CBC, I heard that the US has to deal with offensive statements on the part of Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.  President Ahmadinejad is suggesting that the US itself, not Al-Qaeda, flew planes into the World Trade Centre, etc.

Yes, there are occasions when one is “set up.”  The persons attacked are made to look as though they were attacked by an outside party when, in fact, they have been attacked by themselves.  In the case of the 9/11 attacks, the attacker was Al-Qaeda and the attacked, innocent American citizens.  So I believe that President Ahmadinejad is a dangerous lunatic.

The United States does have an enemy within.  For instance, it would appear that, to a significant extent, the Tea Party is obstructionistic.  It creates obstacles that make it extremely difficult for the current administration to carry out its duties.

But in the case of the 9/11 attacks, the United States was the victim of Al-Qaeda.  It was not its own victim.  In other words, Al-Qaeda provoked the US causing the US to engage in two ruinous wars.  But in no way would the US order American pilots to fly planes into New York’s World Trade Centre Towers, into the Pentagon and, possibly, into another iconic monument, had it not been for the courage of the passengers of flight 93.

And now Ahmadinejad is drumming up attention by having the US play agent provocateur in its own demise, when the truth is that real agent provocateur Admadinejad.  Isn’t that a dirty game?  Could it be that Iranian President Ahmadinejad expects retaliative action on the part of the US?  Ahmadinejad is not Bin Laden, the leader of a major terrorist organisation, but he is an insufferable trouble-maker.

What does one do?

Occasionally, one must retaliate, but, at other times, one’s best retaliation is no retaliation.  In my opinion, the US should deny Ahmadinejab’s allegations and, once it has done so, rally and rebuild, putting people to work.

Last night, I watched a WordPress video on the capture of Bin Laden.  The Navy Seals acted as one man when they killed Bin Laden.  It was a superbly choreographed event.  Not that I endorse killing others, but that the World had to deal with a rotten apple to avoid further mischief.

It would be lovely to see Washington act in as unified a manner.

I have just received a Metropolitan Museum Holiday catalogue.  I was please to see that the current issue featured an East meets West collection and, by extension, a West meets East collection.  The Curator of the Islamic Art’s Department is Navina Najat Haidar.

Let us hope for greater solidarity among the inhabitants of planet Earth.

*   *   *

29 September 2011

0.000000 0.000000

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

WordPress: I need help

28 Wednesday Sep 2011

Posted by michelinewalker in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on WordPress: I need help

Dear World,

Please do not ask me how.  But I have “bousillé” (made a mess of) my WordPress site.  I have done my best to fix it, but nothing works.  However, I am learning a few things.  For instance, I may have learned what an avatar is, but how does one drag it to one’s site, etc…

Could someone at WordPress make sure that things are at least the way they were?

Ironically, I am now listening to Gloria Steinem the great feminist.  She would be ashamed of me:  I’m still the person who tries and fails and tries and fails and suddenly screams.  God, do not abandon me

In this current case, God lodges within the human mind who will make sure I can communicate with the outside world.

See you soon World,

Micheline

0.000000 0.000000

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Pascal & the two Infinities

27 Tuesday Sep 2011

Posted by michelinewalker in French Literature, Human Condition

≈ Comments Off on Pascal & the two Infinities

Tags

duality, Galileo, Montaigne, Montesquieu, Pascal, relativity, space, the infinite, Weltanschauung, WordPress

Blaise Pascal

Blaise Pascal

In his writings about the human condition, Les Pensées or Thoughts, French scientist,  inventor and philosopher Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), positioned mankind between the infinitely large and the infinitely small (Pensées, 199-72*).  He wrote that compared to the universe, humans are infinitely small.  However, compared to a microscopic mite, he called un ciron, humans are infinitely large.

Infinity is a central concept in Pascal’s Weltanschauung or world view.  One of his Pensées, perhaps the most poetical, expresses fear of the infinite.  He writes that “[he] fears the eternal silence of space infinite” (my translation): “Le silence éternel de ces espaces infinis m’effraie” (201-206 B).

That Pascal should have been in awe of space infinite is not altogether surprising.  The main discovery of the Renaissance, the sixteenth century mainly, may well have been planet Earth’s place in the Universe.  Until Copernicus (1473-1543), possibly earlier, planet Earth was looked upon as the centre of the Universe.

But Copernicus placed the Sun at the centre of the universe, thereby introducing heliocentrism.  Later, Galileo Galilei (1564-1652) also observed that the Earth revolved around the Sun.  Such was not the thinking of the Church, so Galileo had to recant on his observation for fear of facing an untimely and painful death.

Although Pascal was a scientist, the Pensées have a spiritual dimension.  In this regard, Pascal’s thoughts on the two infinites resemble his definition of man’s duality.  Humans are mortals, misère, but they can think and know, therefore, but they are miserable.  We are mere reeds, but we think:  le roseau pensant (the thinking reed). Hence our grandeur or nobility.  The fact that humans know they are mortals constitute a redeeming feature. We are neither beasts nor angels.

I have already spoken of Pascal’s symmetrical thinking:  la misère/la grandeur and must note it again.  Pascal discussed our duality, the humaine condition and also does it in his cosmology, thereby giving us, once again, a redeeming half.  Without the infinitely small, the infinitely large would engulf humankind.  So, as I used to tell my students, it was nice of Pascal to bring us back, and down, to Earth.

However, I regret the fact that we did not devote sufficient time to the infinities.  We  associate relativity with Einstein, but long before Einstein theory of relativity, relativity was also a humanistic concept.

Pascal’s two infinities are a most eloquent expression of relativity.  For instance, not unlike Michel de Montaigne (1533-1592), Pascal states that what is an error on one side of the Pyrenees, is truth on the other side of same Pyrenees:  “Vérité au-deça [this side] des Pyrénées, erreur au-delà.”

This is the case with justice and jurisprudence.  An act may legal in one land and illegal in another land.  So there is arbitrariness about justice, a thought which led to French Enlightenment’s  Montesquieu’s (1689-1755) De l’Esprit des Lois (The Spirit of the Laws).  Montesquieu will be discussed in a future post.

For the time being, all I wish to reflect on is that as Christopher Colombus sailed towards India, Galileo and Pascal were exploring space and Montaigne and Pascal were pondering relativity.

*Lafuma and Brunschvicg classification

—ooo—

© Micheline Walker
27 September 2011
WordPress

45.403816 -71.938314

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Golden Goose

26 Monday Sep 2011

Posted by michelinewalker in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on The Golden Goose

Tags

Fareed Zakaria, healthy capitalism, individual and collective needs, Micheline's pension fund, Ostriches, repatriating jobs, the Golden Goose, WordPress

The Golden Goose

The Golden Goose

Mr Zakaria, I agree with you that the world is doing very little to prevent a major collapse of the new global economy.  People are sticking their head in the sand as everyone’s pension fund, including mine, is evaporating.

May I suggest that, financially, countries are poor bedfellows.  Hence the current state of the Euro.  The following example may not be the best, but it is the one that comes to mind at the moment.

I own one-ninth of an apartment building.  Five of a total of fourteen apartments are rented.  The sociétaires look after the apartment they have a right to occupy as fellow owners, but the building itself is rapidly deteriorating because of a lack of proper maintenance.

In my opinion, the problem here may be that the balance between individual and collective needs militates in favour of misunderstood individual needs.  Once an individual closes his or her suite’s door, he or she sees only the elegance and comfort of what he or she considers his or her “one-ninth.”

We inhabit a society where people are unable to grasp that individual needs will not be fulfilled if collective needs are not taken into consideration.  They do not realize that the two are inextricably linked.

Nor do they understand what I call a “healthy” form of capitalism.  As originally conceived, capitalism benefitted the people.  A few well-heeled individuals invested money in a business, employed people locally and, once the employees received their salary, they usually spent it within the community.

This is no longer the case.  Nowadays, capitalists have their products manufactured at the lowest possible cost and ignore all other societal factors.  In other words they export manufacturing jobs nilly willy.

No one can blame them, but it would be my opinion that efforts should be made to encourage companies that will employ locally.  Again, it’s a question of balance.

I am not an economist and cannot therefore comment in the same manner as an expert would.  But I have observed that the moment certain persons get rich they also become misers.   And I have also observed that, if people are well inside their cocoon, they are often quite willing to block other concerns from their consciousness, not realizing they will eventually be their own victims.

If one kills the golden goose, she can no longer produce golden eggs.  That is what some are doing in this society.  As a result, they are less than wise.

*   *   *

September 26, 2011

0.000000 0.000000

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Bourbeau & Suzor-Coté: a Discovery

25 Sunday Sep 2011

Posted by michelinewalker in Sharing

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Bourbeau, Henri IV, Huguenot, Louis XIII, Richelieu, Siege of La Rochelle, Suzor-Côté, WordPress

Log Hauling
 
Log Hauling, by Marc-Aurèle de Foy Suzor-Coté
 

There are happy and unexpected moments.  For instance, a few days ago, I went in search of information on my grandfather’s family.  He was a Bourbeau and he is my mother’s father. I have used his name when publishing scholarly articles:  Bourbeau-Walker.

The Bourbeaus came to New France in the seventeenth century. They were Huguenots, or French Protestants. Two brothers came to New France: Pierre and Simon. They had survived the Siege of La Rochelle (1627-1628), by Richelieu and Louis XIII. The protestants had chosen La Rochelle as their refuge even though the Edict of Nantes (1598) protected them, at least officially, from persecution in other locations.

However, it is at that point in the history of France that absolute monarchy was consolidated. After King Henri IV was assassinated, in 1610, although still in effect, the Edict of Nantes, which stipulated tolerance of Huguenots, was not always respected. Henri IV, who had converted to Catholicism, had been a Huguenot, which is why he was assassinated. His son, Louis XIII, was too young to be crowned, so a regent was chosen: Richelieu. Richelieu became the chief architect of absolute monarchy in France. It was his belief that the King’s subjects should all speak French and be Catholics: one King, one language, one religion.

During the Siege of La Rochelle, some 22,000 protestants were starved to death, but two Bourbeau brothers were among the 5,000 who survived and the two later moved to New France. In 1685, when the Edict of Nantes was revoked by Louis XIV, the Bourbeaus and other French protestants living in New France moved south, to the English colonies. But a few stayed in Canada.

As I was searching Bourbeau entries, I saw a picture of the Bourbeau farm and realized that it was located in the area of Quebec where my grandmother had grown up.  This picture, an oil painting, is the work of Marc-Aurèle de Foy Suzor-Coté (1869-1937), now famous.  I knew that my grandmother had been an artist’s assistant, so I was able to determine for certain, first, that the artist was Suzor-Côté and, second, that in all likelihood she met her husband, a Bourbeau, because the Bourbeaus were close friends of Suzor-Coté.  There are several Bourbeau paintings by Suzor-Côté.

Research is an extremely interesting endeavour because of surprises and coincidences. I will now attempt to incorporate a least one of Suzor-Coté’s paintings in this blog.

A river near the Bourbeau farm
Suzor-Coté
 
 
© Micheline Bourbeau-Walker
25 September 2011
WordPress
0.000000 0.000000

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Middle East musings

23 Friday Sep 2011

Posted by michelinewalker in Uncategorized

≈ 14 Comments

Tags

Camp David 2000, hatred, Israel, level playing field, Lex Talionis, live bombs, Palestine, role of the United Nations, WordPress

On Wednesday, September 21, 2011, I expressed a level of optimism with respect to peace in the Middle East.  I had seen President Obama and President Hamid Karzai speak together with civility and the final handshake seemed genuine.

However, a conflict is looming in the traditional Middle East.  On the one hand,  Palestine is asking for nationhood and, on the other hand, Israel wants protection from Arab attacks.

In a recent address to the United Nations, Obama stated that Palestinians deserve “their own state,” which they do, but he added that this can “only be achieved through talks with Israel” (BBC, UK, September 21, 2011).

It may be worth reviewing the manner in which Israel came to be a nation.  Six million Jews had been killed by the Nazis, which could have been a catalyst for the creation of Israel.  Moreover, if they were to be a Jewish State, the Jews wanted to live in their “promised land” and, because of their circumstances at that time, this wish seemed legitimate.  However, this “promised land” was Palestine in general and Jerusalem in particular.

The Jewish tribes had been dispersed about two thousand years before the creation of the State of Isreal, on May 14, 1948.  Yet, in 1948, there were Jews already or still living in Palestine, then under British control.  So Palestine made room for the remainder of Europe’s Jewish population.  Arab Palestinians were therefore displaced for the arrival of European Jews who had survived the Holocaust.

But, let us return to more current events.  Palestinian authorities are now before the United Nations asking for the same type of nationhood that was granted to Israel. Palestinians deserve nationhood.  However, had Yasser Arafat accepted Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barack’s offer (Camp David Summit, 2000), Palestinian nationhood would have been achieved by now, and it would have been achieved “through talks with Israel.”  Prime Minister Ehud Barack’s offer was generally perceived to be generous and just.

Given, however, the rejection of Ehud Barack’s offer, can Palestinians now expect Israel to withdraw from the territories it has occupied since the 1967 Seven Day War? In the mind of a large number of Israelis, this land is perceived to belong to Israel, which is not the case.

Given also, the murderous attacks perpetrated by some Arab Palestinian radicals against Israelis and the subsequent Israeli retaliation against Palestinians, confidence in a peaceful coexistence between Israelis and Palestinians has been eroded.  Not that the creation of a Palestine is a pipe dream, but that Israel needs and deserves guarantees that it will not be attacked.

As for the Palestinians, in the current climate of distrust amongst the parties involved, they need a level playing field in order to deal with the legitimate security concerns of the Israelis.

Providing this level playing field could be the role of the United Nations.  Israel cannot live in constant fear of attacks from Arab countries.  Although both Israel and Palestine deserve nationhood, further bloodshed is unacceptable.  So I wonder whether nationhood for Palestinians can “only be achieved through talks.”

Perhaps.  But to the words of President Obama, I would add that considerable good faith on the part of both Israeli and Palestinian negotiators is imperative and that Palestinian authorities need to deal with its Iranian terrorist group, Hamas, which teaches hatred against Jews, the sort of hatred that can convince human beings to transform themselves into live bombs.

In other words, I would suggest that it would be in the best interest of Middle East countries, including Israel, to promote peace, which would mean rethinking the ancient wisdom of the lex talionis: “An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.”

Rethinking such wisdom would be a concession to Christian teaching, except that Christ was himself a Jew and a Palestinian.

*   *   *

September 23, 2011

0.000000 0.000000

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Troy Davis: The Lex Talionis

22 Thursday Sep 2011

Posted by michelinewalker in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Troy Davis: The Lex Talionis

Tags

justice on the stand, Lex Talionis, Mrs MacPhail, peace, reasonable doubt, sacrifial lamb, Troy Davis, WordPress

The Supreme Court could have saved Troy Davis’s life.  There was reasonable   doubt.  So now two mothers are grieving or, in the case of Mrs MacPhail, attempting to grieve, the death of a son.  The lex talionis (loi du talion) prevailed.  An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth…  except that, in the current case, it was a son for a son, whether or not the son who was executed was guilty of the crime he allegedly committed:  killing Mrs MacPhail’s son.

I watched Anderson Cooper’s interview with Marc MacPhail’s mother.  Mr Cooper wanted to know whether Mrs MacPhail would feel “peace,” after the execution of Troy Davis.

Mrs MacPhail answered that she hoped to feel peace, but will she?  Officer MacPhail, her son, is still dead.  Nothing can bring him back to his family.  And now, compounding  matters, doubt concerning Mr Davis’s guilt lingers and will continue to linger, thus hindering peace.  Therefore, executing Troy Davis is still a tragedy, but a larger one.

Troy Davis’s mother will mourn her son, but it seems unlikely Mrs MacPhail will feel peace.  I hope, for her sake, that she does, but may I repeat that there was reasonable doubt as to Mr Davis’s guilt.

The lex talionis seems little more than sanctioned revenge.  Moreover, what the world may have witnessed is a classic case of scapegoating.  It appears that Troy Davis was the archetypal sacrificial lamb.

What is now on the stand is justice itself.

*   *   *

September 22, 2011

0.000000 0.000000

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Scapegoating: Troy Davis

21 Wednesday Sep 2011

Posted by michelinewalker in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Scapegoating: Troy Davis

Tags

peace, reasonable doubt, Scapegoat, the death penalty, Troy Davis, WordPress

There is reasonable doubt as to whether or not Troy Davis is guilty of murdering Marc MacPhail.

His being executed will bring “peace” to his grieving mother.  But can anyone feel peace if an innocent man is put to death?

Troy Davis is a human being and he has already spent twenty years in prison.  It seems that the courts have found a scapegoat.

Indeed, what I am hearing is:  “Someone has been killed, so let us kill someone, anyone…  It may as well be Troy Davis.”  That’s scapegoating.

But please do not excecute a person if there is “reasonable doubt” as to his guilt.  In fact, do away with the death penalty altogether.

*   *   *

September 21, 2011

0.000000 0.000000

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

“Que sais-je ?”

21 Wednesday Sep 2011

Posted by michelinewalker in Uncategorized

≈ 13 Comments

Tags

brotherhood, commonality, Hillary Clinton, Montaigne, peace, President Hamid Karzai, President Obama, WordPress

Yesterday, I saw a video that led me to think that there just may be greater acceptance of other cultures and, especially, of the Middle East.

The video showed President Obama speaking with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan.  I saw two men who were speaking calmly and with civility.  Could this be the work of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton?  Perhaps, but there just may be more.

Many soldiers died in Afghanistan during the last few years, some of whom were Canadian soldiers.  There are unhappy memories and I feel genuine sorrow for those who have lost a loved one.

Moreover, as a woman, I rather enjoy being able to show my face.  But it could be that women whose faces are hidden and whose husbands have many wives are nevertheless happy.  “Que sais-je ?” (What do I know?)  These are the words of Michel de Montaigne  (1533-1592).

Unfortunately, one cannot roll back history, but one can make today the first day of the rest of one’s life.  We have that option.

In other words, I felt a sense of relief viewing these two Presidents speaking humbly with one another and then shake hands.

Let us hope for greater brotherhood among human beings.  Cultures may differ, but we are all human beings.  There is therefore a profound level of commonality between all of us.

It is my most sincere wish that humans will now work with one another and avoid conflicts.

*  *  *

September 21, 2011

0.000000 0.000000

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

A Sense of Urgency

19 Monday Sep 2011

Posted by michelinewalker in United States

≈ Comments Off on A Sense of Urgency

Tags

democracy, good faith, James Carville, John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, obstructionism, President Obama, Republic, sabotage, WordPress

According to James Carville, President Obama should make changes within his team and replace some of its players.  I wish that matters were so simple that merely reshuffling the team would solve the problem.  With all due respect, I do not think firing and reshuffling will work.  The problem has other roots.  America’s current woes have little to do with President Obama and his administration.  So let us look in another direction.

Foremost in my mind, at this moment, is the total failure on the part of hardline Republicans to work towards the good of their nation.  I have heard a few words to the contrary.  In an NBC Meet the Press interview with David Gregory, Senate minority Leader Mitch McConnell said that, “there are actually things we [Republicans and Democrats] agree on” (quoted by Josh Feldman, 18 September 2011).

However, House Speaker John Boehner, who was quoted and seen in a video incorporated into the Meet the Press interview, says that “tax increases, I think, are off the table.  I don’t  think they can be a viable option the Joint Committee.”  One wonders, therefore, whether or not President Obama has a partner in the Republican party.

Let this be my first question.  I have seen and heard all current Republican candidates tell what each would bring to the United States if he or she were elected to the leadership of the Republican party.  Not in any of their answers did I hear the words égalité and fraternité, equality and brotherhood, the founding principles, along with liberty, of a democracy, or republic.  I realize that Republicans need a leader, but were this leader to become President, would he or she tend to the needs of the nation and require the affluent to pay their fair share of taxes.  Given House Speaker John Boehner’s statement, I doubt it.  Moreover, Senator McConnell pointed out that the elections would be held next year, not this year.  Yet now is the time to act.

Can these Republicans not see that the United States is descending into an abyss and that America cannot wait.  And why this descent?  There is a simple answer.  It seems to me that Congress is not a forum, which it should be, but an arena, a sport’s arena.  And it also appears to me that although the Civil War ended in 1865, it has not ended.  Hardline Republicans are at war with their own country and this is not acceptable.

Yes, Americans can rally behind a leader, but it appears that hardline Republicans cannot see and, more importantly, do not want to see that Congress is not a battle field.  As Abraham Lincoln stated, “[a] house divided against itself cannot stand.”

—000—

Dear Republicans, do make choosing a future candidate to the Presidency a lesser priority than the work you have been mandated to do, but are not doing:  making sure there is bread on everyone’s table.  Moreover, do stop, purposefully and in full view of the entire world, sabotaging the current administration.  Your work is to ensure America remains functional and that it grows.

I hope you realize that there is no quick fix for the harm inflicted on America during the former Republican administration and that you also realize obstructionism is  unacceptable.  It is legitimate for one party to oppose the other party, within reasonable limits, but a party, the opposition, does not engage in obstructionism, especially at the cost of the nation.  Current circumstances call for prompt remedial action.  Therefore, throwing stones at the other party will not benefit the people of America.  Besides, such behaviour is childish.

As for President Obama, I am asking him to be ruthless.  No country should tolerate irresponsible naysayers, but all I hear from hardline Republicans is a constant “let them eat cake.”  They do not seem to care for the people.  Is that a dignified way to treat the citizens who have elected a candidate into office?

In a previous blog, I wrote that I didn’t think Marie-Antoinette ever said “let them eat cake” to the French, but “let them eat cake” is what the French heard, and they stormed the Bastille.  Systematic obstructionism is serious wrong-doing, particularly when a country, the United States of America, is on the brink of an economic disaster.  As I have written in other blogs, there is an enemy within.  America is its own worst enemy, except that markets have become global markets, which means that all stand to lose.  Wake up!

Finally, why am I not detecting in the statements made by the candidates to the leadership of the Republican Party the sense of urgency (not panic, urgency) Mr Carville expressed when he proposed firing and reshuffling in the current administration?  That is my second question.  When will you start expressing genuine concern for the ills of the nation and act accordingly?  I may not think firing and reshuffling are necessary, but I fully agree with Mr Carville that something drastic must be done.  That is why I am asking President Obama to be ruthless, in which my suggestion resembles Mr Carville’s suggestions.

It has always been my understanding that elected officials worked for and not against the good of their country and that, once elected into office, a President is everyone’s President.  President Obama is President of the United States, which means that he is your President.

—ooo—

© Micheline Walker
19 September 2011
WordPress

Micheline's Blog

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts

Europa

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,510 other subscribers

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Winter Scenes
  • Epiphany 2023
  • Pavarotti sings Schubert’s « Ave Maria »
  • Yves Montand chante “À Bicyclette”
  • Almost ready
  • Bicycles for Migrant Farm Workers
  • Tout Molière.net : parti …
  • Remembering Belaud
  • Monet’s Magpie
  • To Lori Weber: Language Laws in Quebec, 2

Archives

Calendar

September 2011
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« Aug   Oct »

Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • WordPress.org

micheline.walker@videotron.ca

Micheline Walker

Micheline Walker

Social

Social

  • View belaud44’s profile on Facebook
  • View Follow @mouchette_02’s profile on Twitter
  • View Micheline Walker’s profile on LinkedIn
  • View belaud44’s profile on YouTube
  • View Miicheline Walker’s profile on Google+
  • View michelinewalker’s profile on WordPress.org

Micheline Walker

Micheline Walker
Follow Micheline's Blog on WordPress.com

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

  • Follow Following
    • Micheline's Blog
    • Join 2,478 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Micheline's Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: